| Author |
Topic  |
|
|
Raymond.Wand
413 Posts |
|
|
Raymond.Wand
413 Posts |
|
|
Bill.Mullen
71 Posts |
Posted - 09/13/2005 : 16:03:44
|
I am wondering what positive intent Mr. Wand could possibly have by posting these messages and the several links therein.
He is providing leads to information that in most cases is woefully outdated and in many cases has been changed. As anyone who has been following the progression of the National Initiative is aware, the official, final document has not been made public yet. To point people towards these early, raw drafts is nothing short of misleading.
The information in the early drafts illustrated what some of the requirements, etc. might have been. As more information was studied and researched, the document experienced a few major transitions until it reached its present final and fair state.
The CHIBO Committee has finished its work of devloping the National Certification Program for Canadian Home Inspectors. The correct, final document will soon be released.
Bill Mullen RHI |
 |
|
|
Raymond.Wand
413 Posts |
Posted - 09/13/2005 : 17:14:00
|
Mr. Mullen for your information I posted all these links as a courtesy to the members of OAHI and as a repository of all current information, whether outdated or not! It is much more information than you or CAHPI have been willing to provide at any point in time on this forum or to the membership. I don't ever recall seeing or reading anywhere on this site or anywhere else including CAHPI website all the info that is available as provided by the links.
You have been consistent in stating both on this forum and others that I am out to derail the National and CHIBO, and any other notion that you can seem to fit into your myopic agenda. You have a tendency to make statements which you cannot back up. That means you are prevericating in order to try and discredit me. That seems to be in violation of the Code of Ethics and the Forum Rules, and I am surprise at your comments considering your role as appointed spokesperson for CAHPI as Director of Strategic Alliances.
Again I would urge you to reread my post, there is no editorial comment other than the paranoia you seem to enjoy reading into anything posted by me.
Now do you really want this thread to deterioate to your level or do you want to be helpful? Please also refer to page 5 of previous posts entitled "The National" you seem to have exhibited your animosities on that thread as well.
Whom is misleading whom?
Thank You.
Raymond Wand RHI and Member of CAHPI Alton, ON |
 |
|
| |
Topic  |
|
|
|